Assessment 1: Written Assignment [WA1]
Due: Sunday by 23:59
Points: 30
Submitting: an external tool
Available: Mar 3 at 0:00 – Apr 27 at 23:59
Title of assignment
Academic analytical essay on a contemporary professional issue impacting the discipline of nursing.
Instructions
A 1500-word (+/- 10%) written assessment on contemporary professional issues impacting the discipline of
nursing. This assessment has a weighting of 30%. This assessment task will enable students to practice
writing and presenting research evidence related to the topic in a logical manner. It should demonstrate the
development of the argument using supporting literature.
Please consider carefully following the rubrics and link provided below as you construct your assessment.
IHM Assessment Guide
ULOs addressed in Assessment 1
- ULO 1. Analyse contemporary professional issues facing the discipline of nursing;
- ULO 2. Appraise the literature in relation to organisational and regulatory frameworks that impact nursing as a profession;
- ULO 3. Critically examine a range of social, technological, environmental, cultural and economic factors that influence contemporary professional nursing;
Content
Identify one current professional issue impacting the discipline of nursing. Critically analyse current
discussions and research evidence that support and justify your paper. The student may choose from one of
the below issues or an alternative issue that has been approved by the lecturer. Some of the currently
identified issues include:
- Nursing burnout
- Compassion fatigue
- Workplace safety
- Nursing shortages
- Increased workload
- Recruitment and retention
- An aging workforce
- Violence against nursing
- Horizontal violence
- Bullying
- Diversity
- Gender bias
Assessment instructions:
Request for extension of assignment due dates:
The student applies for an extension by completing the “Application for Extension form” form.
For your application to be considered, the unit coordinator must receive it before the due date for your
assessment task.
Use the link below to apply for an extension time of a maximum of seven calendar days from the original
due date for submission of assessment tasks (essays, projects, reflective journals) of your program.
Application for Extension
Application for Special Consideration:
Where circumstances outside a student’s control prevent the student from attempting or completing an
assessment task or end-of-unit examination at the scheduled time or meant that their performance was
significantly affected, the student may apply for special consideration. Applications for special consideration
must be submitted no later than three working days after the due date of the assessment task or the date of
the examination.
Late applications will only be considered where the student can demonstrate to IHM that extenuating
circumstances prevented them from applying any earlier.
Please ensure that you have read the Special Consideration in Assessment and Examination Policy and
Procedure before completing this application form.
Special Consideration Procedure
This form needs to be forwarded to the Course Coordinator of GCAN: wilma@ihm.edu.au
(Wilma Jasmine Crasta).
All the extension and special consideration requests must be forwarded using the student outlook email rather than from your personal email.
Late Submissions:
Students who submit an assessment task after the due date (original or extended) will incur an academic
penalty of 5% for each day late up to a maximum of 7 days. If an assessment task is more than 7 days
late, will receive only a 50% (pass) grade.
Analytical Essay structure Instruction:
- Add the Title page as outlined by the academic writing guidelines.
IHM Academic Writing Guidelines
- The essay should be structured using the standard essay format with an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion and Reference list.
Stuck in This Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Introduction:
Introduce the essay following the order (Maximum 10% total word count 150 words):
- A general statement about the topic that provides a context for your argument
- A thesis statement (purpose statement)
- A road map of the essay (how will you present and develop arguments)
Body:
It elaborates your argument from the Introduction. Present a reasoned case supported by evidence from relevant scholarship written in paragraphs.
Each paragraph should be only 150-200 word to avoid too long or too short paragraphs. Single-sentence paragraphs are abrupt and should be used infrequently.
Paragraphs that are too long (i.e., longer than one double-spaced manuscript page) risk losing readers’ attention.
Each body paragraph should have one main idea that supports the argument from the essay topic which is supported by relevant examples and evidence
from the body of scholarly work on your topic.
Begin the paragraph with a topic sentence (a clear context for the information to follow). A good topic sentence summarizes the main message of the paragraph.
Each paragraph should be coherently structured at the micro level and macro level (in the paragraph and between the paragraphs).
Conclusion:
Approximately 10% of the total word count is 150 words. Include:
- Summary of the content written
- Not to add any new information
- Do not simply repeat yourself.
- How the topic links to the wider context (Bigger picture) in your discipline
Writing and Referencing:
Use appropriate academic writing style, including clear and concise language, proper grammar, and correct citations.
Do not use any AI tool to format and write the content as it can produce a high AI score. This will be
considered as an act of breaching the Academic Integrity Policy.
Include in-text citations and provide a comprehensive reference list for all sources used.
Add an adequate number of in-text citations. In-text references or citations are used to acknowledge the work or ideas of others.
In-text Citations and the reference list should be formatted using APA 7. Please use a minimum 10 quality references and keep no more than 50 words of direct quote.
Research & Analysis:
Use current peer-reviewed literature, including scholarly articles, research papers, policy documents, and credible websites.
Use IHM library, Google Scholar and databases such as Pub Med.
Conduct a thorough review of current literature, including scholarly articles, research papers, policy documents, and reputable websites.
Focus on recent publications (within the last seven years) to ensure the information is up-to-date and reflects the current understanding of the issue.
Get 30% Discount on This Assignment Answer Today!
Essay 1
Criteria Ratings
Logical argument of ideas and critical analysis and synthesis supported by the relevant literature
- High Distinction (>80%) – The assignment developed an excellent argument about the assessment topic with a creative and articulated discussion and analysis in an integrated and organised approach that did not contain any irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated an excellent approach in the application.
- Distinction (70-79%) – The assignment developed a very good argument about the assessment topic with a clear and creative discussion and analysis in an integrated and organised approach that did not contain any irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated a very good approach in the application of arguments.
- Credit (60-69%) – The assignment developed a good and reasonable argument about the assessment topic with some discussion and analysis in a relatively integrated and organized approach that contains no irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated some arguments and critical analysis.
- Pass (50-59%) – The assignment developed a reasonable argument about the assessment topic with some discussion and analysis that contains some irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated a predominantly descriptive approach in the arguments, a limited use of critical analysis, and a minimal logical approach in reference to the literature.
- Fail (45-49%) – The assignment developed a poor argument about the assessment topic with limited discussion and analysis that contain irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated a very poor approach in critical analysis with no logical approach in relevant discussion or analysis.
- Fail (0-44%) – The assignment developed a poor argument about the assessment topic with limited discussion and analysis that contains irrelevant material or repetition of content; the assignment incorporated no approach to critical analysis.
Demonstrated understanding of the topic
- High Distinction (>80%) – An excellent level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated, incorporating integrated and consistent support from the literature.
- Distinction (70-79%) – A very good level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated incorporating consistent support from the literature.
- Credit (60-69%) – A good level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated incorporating consistent support from the literature.
- Pass (50-59%) – A reasonable level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated incorporating some support from the literature.
- Fail (45-49%) – A poor level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated.
- Fail (0-44%) – A very poor level of understanding of the topic was demonstrated.
Writing style, grammar & referencing
- High Distinction (>80%) – Contains 1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling; meets APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references, etc. References are current; consistently conform to APA with the most important and most recent resources presented.
- Distinction (70-79%) – Contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling; meets appropriate APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references, etc. conforms to APA. References are current; mostly referencing.
- Credit (60-69%) – Contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling; meets minimal APA guidelines regarding appropriate margins, font, references. References include a number of irrelevant resources generally.
- Pass (50-59%) – Contains 5 or more grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors; References are outdated with some lapses where they do not conform to APA referencing style does not always adhere to acceptable conventions with a few.
- Fail (45-49%) – Contains numerous grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors; does not use appropriate margins, font, References do not conform to APA referencing style, in-text and/or in the reference list; referencing is written in a poor manner and does not adhere to acceptable standards.
- Fail (0-44%) – No skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic; does not use formal academic English style/constant inconsistencies of style; uses informal English expressions and personal language inappropriate to academic purpose; incorrect use of grammar, very limited vocabulary; inappropriate sentence structure often does not convey meaning; inadequate punctuation and/or spelling; language fails to communicate meaning clearly.
Total Points: 30
Get Solved Your Assignment( variable) and Earn A+ Grade!
Get Help By Expert
Struggling with your Nursing Burnout Challenges and Impact on Healthcare assignment? Well! Stop worrying now. You are at the right place. Our platform provides the best Malaysia assignment Help AI-free. We have experienced writers who provide high-quality, no-plagiarism assignments with 100% original content, and here are free sample assignments that you can look over to see the quality of our work. Contact us right now and get high grades in your academics.
